We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: SSK-018
Details
Submitted by[?]: Fatherland Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4254
Description[?]:
Change in WC nominations. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Nomination for Security Council Seat B. (For more information, see )
http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453http
Old value:: Deltaria
Current: Beiteynu
Proposed: Abstain
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Nomination for Security Council Seat C. (For more information, see )
http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453http
Old value:: Baltusia
Current: Abstain
Proposed: Abstain
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:31:19, August 09, 2017 CET | From | Fatherland Front | To | Debating the SSK-018 |
Message | They are not supporting out bid for council A so why the heck are we supporting them? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 190 | |||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 260 |
Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
Random quote: "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end." - John Dalberg-Acton |