Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5460
Next month in: 00:50:16
Server time: 11:09:43, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Brazil25 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Preserving Mother Terra

Details

Submitted by[?]: Socialist Workers Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 4255

Description[?]:

Legislation that addresses environmental issues.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:56:23, August 10, 2017 CET
FromSocialist Workers Party
ToDebating the Preserving Mother Terra
MessageMr. Speaker,

Votes against this legislation proves that you and your party do not care about our environment. Voting against this legislation means putting short-term profits over long-term benefits to the environment. One cannot be "pro-market" and pro-environment. Capitalism is incompatible with saving Terra.

I yield.

Date19:43:18, August 10, 2017 CET
FromRepublican Green Party
ToDebating the Preserving Mother Terra
MessageMr. Speaker,

It is evident that the Socialist Worker's Party does not have an understanding of green politics. Green politics can co-exist with capitalism, despite the ranting that the gentleman from the SWP has spewed forth here. There are some of these measures that are worth consideration as part of a long term aim to improve Luthori's environment, but going from no regulations to extreme regulations will cost workers dearly. For a party that claims it represents the workers to promote a policy that, while it will have long term gains for Luthori, will also cause extreme misery for millions of workers smacks of either self-serving arrogance, ignorance or sheer wilful disregard for its primary constituency.

I yield.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 92

no
    

Total Seats: 304

abstain
 

Total Seats: 4


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73