We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Right to Life Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party of Telamon
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2064
Description[?]:
| We propose we ban abortion, as even though the mother might not want a child, do you think the infant wants to die? Ofcourse it will be allowade in extreme circumstances |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Proposed: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:51:43, June 02, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Right to Life Act |
| Message | No, I will not support this bill. A woman has a right to have an abortion if she so wishes. It is her decision to make and she must live with the consequences. The existing law is therefore fine on this matter. |
| Date | 13:58:13, June 02, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Right to Life Act |
| Message | A really big shoe |
| Date | 14:13:03, June 02, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Right to Life Act |
| Message | No, it is a perfectly valid position to take. |
| Date | 14:29:58, June 02, 2005 CET | From | To | Debating the Right to Life Act |
| Message | Didn't we propose this exact bill not long ago and the TCP voted no. I suppose when you see our yes vote you will change your own just to be different from us |
| Date | 15:57:09, June 02, 2005 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the Right to Life Act |
| Message | RE: Exclude Likaton TCP has intereruptted one of LIkaton's bill debates. So, instead of the diplomatic way of dealing with, I'm going to do it the way he did. I'm going to uunnecessary intervene in one of your debates. You passed a bill that is supposed to make us NOT intervene, which is now null and void due to his/her activites. In the debate phase for my bill: Police Armament Resolution, TCP has left a very pointless and spammy message. For that reason, you are now expected to withdraw your previous hyporcitical act. To enforce it will now prove that you're a shallow two-bit nation with no respect for anyone or anything but your own bloody insignficant hides. |
| Date | 22:46:21, June 02, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Right to Life Act |
| Message | Just because he's doing it, does not mean the rest of us are... You are just as hyproctical as he is now. If you have a complaint, ... i dunno, i guess here is fine. but still we can't do anything of his own actions......but you can...soon. ;) |
| Date | 22:46:44, June 02, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Right to Life Act |
| Message | and yeah we agree with TCP's Proposal...and only the proposal part. >_< |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 69 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 45 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 37 |
| Random fact: Parties have the ability to endorse another party's candidate for the Head of State election (if there is one). This adds a strategic element to the elections. |
| Random quote: “Their cheap talk of the 'greater good' is a thinly concealed excuse for subordinating the people to the institutionalized violence that is the state.” - Margaret Woodhall, former Dranian politician |