Bill: Policing Bill 426.1
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4264
|We would like to improve the effectiveness ad swiftness of our police forces.|
Old value:: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court or have reasonable grounds to suspect that a crime was committed.
Current: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court or have reasonable grounds to suspect that a crime was committed.
Proposed: The police can search a person or their property without restrictions.
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
|Date||02:39:59, August 28, 2017 CET||From||New Green Party of Lodamun||To||Debating the Policing Bill 426.1|
Our party cannot support this bill. We believe our people should have a right to privacy, one that this kind of law would breach. We also believe that giving police unadulterated power to search without restriction could significantly backfire and lead to mistrust between the people and the police that could eventually lead to civil unrest.
Deputy Chairwoman of the NGPoL
|Date||04:17:29, August 28, 2017 CET||From||Social liberal party of lodamun||To||Debating the Policing Bill 426.1|
|Message||A bill tha violates the rights of its citizens will not pass and I will vote against|
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Total Seats: 268
Total Seats: 242
Total Seats: 89
|Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. The [Socialist Party] has lost.|
|Random quote: "The superior man is distressed by the limitations of his ability; he is not distressed by the fact that men do not recognize the ability that he has." - Confucius|