Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 03:22:11
Server time: 08:37:48, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Health spending proposal

Details

Submitted by[?]: Seosavists Republican party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2190

Description[?]:

The Seosavists Republican party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to fund the health service and attract investment

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:17:37, February 21, 2006 CET
FromSeosavists Republican party
ToDebating the Health spending proposal
MessageSame deal as my earlier "tax and spend" bill:
To stimulate the economy we suggest the following tax adjustment, we propose lowering the corporation tax as this encourages forgien companies to invest in us and it allows corporations to reinvest their money, if they do not reinvest it and the owners spend the money it will come under the even higher luxury goods tax.

The maths:
4% corporation tax is : 567,493,202LPD
Which is 851,239,803 less money brought in.

15% Sales tax on luxury goods is: 10,033,103,312
Which is: 3344367770.5 extra

That means we get 2,493,127,967.5 extra revenue in total.

Since we alread have a 4,559,023,881surplus that gives us 7052151849 to spend,

I spend 6,000,000,000 extra with this proposal so we would be left in the end with
1,052,151,849 surplus

Date08:45:20, February 22, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Health spending proposal
MessageThe maths works, and this brings indirect taxation closer to the whopping income tax rate, so we say aye.

Date14:46:59, February 22, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Health spending proposal
MessageI'll go for it.

Date17:35:05, February 22, 2006 CET
FromSeosavists Republican party
ToDebating the Health spending proposal
Messagewhy are you against this LDP?

Date17:38:44, February 22, 2006 CET
FromShuggoth Progressive Party
ToDebating the Health spending proposal
MessageI would rather reduce the income tax than spend our surplus on entitlements.

Date18:32:09, February 22, 2006 CET
FromSeosavists Republican party
ToDebating the Health spending proposal
Messagebut this reduces tax on corporations.

Date08:53:45, February 23, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Health spending proposal
MessageWe can always increase that again next time we need to spend. Give the income tax payers a break!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 326

no
 

Total Seats: 78

abstain
   

Total Seats: 346


Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364

Random quote: "Global warming, at least the modern nightmare vision, is a myth. I am sure of it and so are a growing number of scientists. But what is really worrying is that the world's politicians and policy makers are not." - David Bellamy

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65