We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Retirement Age Reduction Act 4265
Details
Submitted by[?]: Fortschrittsvereinigung
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4265
Description[?]:
Reducing the retirement age to a more sane, sensible age. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 68
Current: 65
Proposed: 66
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:33:01, August 31, 2017 CET | From | Hosian-Konservative Allianz | To | Debating the Retirement Age Reduction Act 4265 |
Message | Herr President, The retirement age should be going up as the average age of humans are going up as well, not lowering it. People are able to work longer and longer, if they so choose. Joachim Regismund von Rohr-Mauss, Deputy State Chancellor |
Date | 08:09:09, September 01, 2017 CET | From | Arctic Democratic Socialist | To | Debating the Retirement Age Reduction Act 4265 |
Message | I believe it should be at least 63. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 59 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 540 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "In heaven all the interesting people are missing." - Friedrich Nietzsche |