Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5470
Next month in: 01:31:39
Server time: 18:28:20, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hyraemous | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of August 2189

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2190

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:18:31, February 22, 2006 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2189
MessageA nice treat for our grand alliance

Date08:33:41, February 22, 2006 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2189
MessageTax and Spend voting no...how predicable

Date06:01:48, February 23, 2006 CET
FromModerate Beluzians
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2189
MessageWell if anything, we're split nearly down the middle. I pity the Nationalist party for having to tie break.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 43

no
    

Total Seats: 53

abstain
 

Total Seats: 4


Random fact: Alduria, Rildanor and Lourenne all have Canrilaise (French) cultures.

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69