We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: P.d.I. 04/4269 Non-Discrimination in the Public Sector Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hizb Altahaluf/Partito dell'Alleanza
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4270
Description[?]:
| The current blanket ban on public sector workers displaying religious symbols is grossly discriminatory towards and offensive to the many, many Ahmadi women who wear the hijab as part of being true to their faith. It is also unfair to others, such as Hosians who are forbidden to wear crucifix symbols. The public sector should treat all citizens fairly and without discrimination. This law must go. Abdul El-Ghazzawi |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: Public officials are not allowed to wear religious symbols while exercising their duties.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:42:35, September 09, 2017 CET | From | Nuova Unione | To | Debating the P.d.I. 04/4269 Non-Discrimination in the Public Sector Act |
| Message | Victoria Alexandretta, FR We fully support this effort, as we believe that all people should be allowed to express their beliefs. |
| Date | 10:47:04, September 09, 2017 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the P.d.I. 04/4269 Non-Discrimination in the Public Sector Act |
| Message | Malik Astori, Leader of LP: "All the people but not if they are public officials and are exercising their duties. The State have to show itself neutral before every citizens. From the judge during a legal proceedings until the employees into the civil registry office have, when exerciting their duties, are representing the State! The State that cannot risk to be accused to be biased! We are sure this decision will generate several complaints about the exercising of public services." |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 359 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 276 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If there are no parties in your nation with seats, feel free to visit the forum and request an early election on the Early Election Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4362 |
| Random quote: “Where would the weapons and equipment come from once you've banned the defence industry? Will we be defended by all your hippy people hurling potatoes and cabbages?” - Margaret Woodhall, former Dranian politician |