Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 4411
Next month in: 02:05:42
Server time: 17:54:17, June 19, 2018 CET
Currently online (14): Axxell | Bacchus | Conservatopia | Dinkus | Hierophant | LegolasRedbard | mm_c1 | MonsieurWagner | petain1951 | Rafaelk45 | ReddyJel | Reston | Sisyphus | Wialre | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Administrative Reform Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Al-Hizb Al-Wataniu Al-Qawmiu

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4271

Description[?]:

Act to reform government administration

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 66

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 9


    Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved.

    Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 56