Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5470
Next month in: 01:50:35
Server time: 06:09:24, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nuclear Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: SDP

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2062

Description[?]:

The current law is ridiculous; our first duty is to protect our citizens.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:20:49, June 02, 2005 CET
FromProletariat Revolution Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Bill
MessageIsn't there a better system? Nuclear technology should be used only as a peace time technology.

Date17:24:52, June 02, 2005 CET
FromSDP
ToDebating the Nuclear Bill
MessageThe option should be available; by voting yes, it does not mean we have to have nuclear wepons; but we reserve the right to.

Date23:20:11, June 02, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Nuclear Bill
Messagei would argue with your statement above. Our first duty is not to protect only our citizens but the world and its entire population. Why cant we continue to set the peaceful example, which has been followed by many nations, instead of going backwards on this? Do you want to spend money on starting cold wars and encouraging distrust between nations?

Date00:10:29, June 03, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the Nuclear Bill
MessageWe dont represnt the people of the whole world. We represent our own citizens, the Likatonians.

Date08:35:30, June 03, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Bill
MessageExactly...thank you FP. We are elected by our people not the world..if they want a say in our policies..why don't they come pay our taxes? We will not let other people's opinions guide how we spend those tax dollars or dictate to us how we ought to orient our military.

Date11:24:39, June 03, 2005 CET
FromSDP
ToDebating the Nuclear Bill
MessageTo vote - This act enables us to move freely around the situation as opposed to the rigid law now.

Date12:38:36, June 03, 2005 CET
FromRight Wing Liberals Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Bill
MessageNo to Nukes.
However The RWLP does not believe in this so called 'International Law' our main concern is the people of Likaton and Likaton itself.
Likaton is not Bound by any outside laws!
Likaton is prompted by the national decency of the Likaton peoples.

Date16:27:37, June 03, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Bill
MessageOur people are not militaristic.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 45

no
   

Total Seats: 79

abstain
 

Total Seats: 13


Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting.

Random quote: "We must face the fact that the preservation of individual freedom is incompatible with a full satisfaction of our views of distributive justice." - Friedrich August von Hayek

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 79