We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of November 4277
Details
Submitted by[?]: Gaduridos Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4278
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Gaduridos Conservative Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Go Gaduridos! [PAG]
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Go Gaduridos! [PAG]
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Gaduridos Conservative Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Go Gaduridos! [PAG]
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Gaduridos Conservative Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Hosian Civic Union
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Hosian Civic Union
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Hosian Civic Union
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Go Gaduridos! [PAG]
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Go Gaduridos! [PAG]
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Gaduridos Conservative Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Hosian Civic Union
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:53:32, September 26, 2017 CET | From | Go Gaduridos! [PAG] | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4277 |
| Message | We won't accept. We want a Centrist government with the GLP, and the APG as the main power in the cabinet. We will try to involve a CAG member as well to get a majority, if no CAG member agrees to join the government, we will start talks with the communists. |
| Date | 18:28:00, September 26, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Renew | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4277 |
| Message | What a shame a so called centrist party would rather work with the Far-Left than the centre right or even right whig. |
| Date | 18:56:37, September 26, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Renew | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4277 |
| Message | What a shame a so called centrist party would rather work with the Far-Left than the centre right or even right whig. |
| Date | 20:33:33, September 26, 2017 CET | From | Gaduridos Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4277 |
| Message | Sorry, I was trying to work with the election reaukts but we will try another combination. |
| Date | 21:59:04, September 26, 2017 CET | From | Go Gaduridos! [PAG] | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4277 |
| Message | We would work with the CAG, but if they don't want to work with us, then we don't have any other choice than working with the communists to form a government. |
| Date | 08:51:16, September 27, 2017 CET | From | Hosian Civic Union | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4277 |
| Message | We would be open to a GCC-CAG coalition. |
| Date | 10:17:08, September 27, 2017 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4277 |
| Message | We would be willing to work with the CAG, and will tolerate a CAG dominated cabinet. |
| Date | 17:13:45, September 27, 2017 CET | From | Hosian Civic Union | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 4277 |
| Message | We applaud the Liberals for their pragmatism and invite them to suggest a cabinet proposal that meets their speech. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 352 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 148 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |