Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5472
Next month in: 02:11:18
Server time: 21:48:41, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ADM Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: No more obstructionism!

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2191

Description[?]:

Laziness is illegal!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:07:10, February 24, 2006 CET
FromLiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty
ToDebating the No more obstructionism!
MessageUnion Workers Lazy?
Hardly. (Except for the Teamsters of course {Oh, I always wanted to be a Teamster. So lazy and surly --Homer SImpson})

Date03:28:48, February 24, 2006 CET
FromModerate Beluzians
ToDebating the No more obstructionism!
MessageWow, three bills with the same proposal. Please consider the National Defense party and remove this bill if his passes.

Date00:23:37, February 25, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the No more obstructionism!
MessageWhy?

Date00:24:26, February 25, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the No more obstructionism!
MessageHow could passing the same bill repeatedly hurt anything? It only shows how much we care... ;)

Date00:32:19, February 25, 2006 CET
FromModerate Beluzians
ToDebating the No more obstructionism!
MessageIt also plays havoc with the numbers, I assume.

Date02:40:03, February 25, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the No more obstructionism!
Message:D

Date05:35:42, February 25, 2006 CET
FromLiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty
ToDebating the No more obstructionism!
MessageSpam spam spam spam. Lovely spam! Wonderful spam! Spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam. Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Spam spam spam spam!

Date14:34:25, February 25, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the No more obstructionism!
MessageIs that your idea of debate?

Date16:34:46, February 25, 2006 CET
FromBeluzian Defense and Federalist Party
ToDebating the No more obstructionism!
MessageI am not sure how to vote on this one... if it passes, it stays the same as if it fails...

Date17:05:53, February 25, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the No more obstructionism!
MessageThen vote YES!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 57

no
 

Total Seats: 25

abstain
   

Total Seats: 18


Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented

Random quote: "I'm not an environmentalist. I'm an earth warrior." - Darryl Cherney

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66