We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: No more obstructionism!
Details
Submitted by[?]: People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2191
Description[?]:
Laziness is illegal! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Secondary strike action.
Old value:: Only closely related trade unions can walk out on a sympathy strike in support of other striking workers.
Current: Any trade union can go on a sympathy strike in support of other striking workers.
Proposed: Secondary strike action is illegal. Workers and unions can only go on strike for their own pay and conditions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:07:10, February 24, 2006 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the No more obstructionism! |
Message | Union Workers Lazy? Hardly. (Except for the Teamsters of course {Oh, I always wanted to be a Teamster. So lazy and surly --Homer SImpson}) |
Date | 03:28:48, February 24, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the No more obstructionism! |
Message | Wow, three bills with the same proposal. Please consider the National Defense party and remove this bill if his passes. |
Date | 00:23:37, February 25, 2006 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the No more obstructionism! |
Message | Why? |
Date | 00:24:26, February 25, 2006 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the No more obstructionism! |
Message | How could passing the same bill repeatedly hurt anything? It only shows how much we care... ;) |
Date | 00:32:19, February 25, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the No more obstructionism! |
Message | It also plays havoc with the numbers, I assume. |
Date | 02:40:03, February 25, 2006 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the No more obstructionism! |
Message | :D |
Date | 05:35:42, February 25, 2006 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the No more obstructionism! |
Message | Spam spam spam spam. Lovely spam! Wonderful spam! Spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam. Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Spam spam spam spam! |
Date | 14:34:25, February 25, 2006 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the No more obstructionism! |
Message | Is that your idea of debate? |
Date | 16:34:46, February 25, 2006 CET | From | Beluzian Defense and Federalist Party | To | Debating the No more obstructionism! |
Message | I am not sure how to vote on this one... if it passes, it stays the same as if it fails... |
Date | 17:05:53, February 25, 2006 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the No more obstructionism! |
Message | Then vote YES! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 57 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 25 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 18 |
Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
Random quote: "I'm not an environmentalist. I'm an earth warrior." - Darryl Cherney |