We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Treaty Withdrawal Act 4288
Details
Submitted by[?]: al-Hizb al-Shaeb al-Badara
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4288
Description[?]:
| An Act to withdraw from various treaties which the Badaran Government has deemed contrary to the interests of the Badaran people. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Agreement of Friendship, Co-operation and Non-Aggression between Zardugal and the Majatran Revolutionary Socialist Federation.
Article 2
Withdraw from the Charter of the Majatran Union.
Article 3
Withdraw from the Dolgavian Trade Association and Economic Pact.
Article 4
Withdraw from the Dundorfian Free Investment Partnership (DFIP).
Article 5
Withdraw from the Fellowship Treaty of Cildania and Badara.
Article 6
Withdraw from the Majatran Socialist Defensive Treaty.
Article 7
Withdraw from the Treaty on the Creation of the Majatran Revolutionary Socialist Federation (MRSF).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 500 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
| Random quote: "The main problem of the left is that it has been traditionally divided and unable to reach agreements between different leftist views, whilst the right has almost always moved in the same direction by giving concessions to different rightist points of view." - Aelius Celer, former Selucian politician |