We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of April 4289
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grüne Demokratische Partei
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4289
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Grüne Demokratische Partei
Article 2
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Dorvische Nationale Partei
Article 3
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Grüne Demokratische Partei
Article 4
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Dorvische Nationale Partei
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Fortschrittsvereinigung
Article 6
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Alternative für Dorvik
Article 7
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Grüne Demokratische Partei
Article 8
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Alternative für Dorvik
Article 9
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Grüne Demokratische Partei
Article 10
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Fortschrittsvereinigung
Article 11
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Dorvische Nationale Partei
Article 12
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Grüne Demokratische Partei
Article 13
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Fortschrittsvereinigung
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:55:24, October 18, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Nationale Partei | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 4289 |
| Message | Cut your ties with the CotS, and we will consider it. Amadeus Schmidt RP Leader |
| Date | 18:31:21, October 18, 2017 CET | From | Grüne Demokratische Partei | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 4289 |
| Message | Mr Schmidt, What are our ties with CotS? Because we have overlapping members? Should we discriminate based on religion? Cindy Kirchen Co-Leader of Pragmatismus |
| Date | 22:29:43, October 18, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Nationale Partei | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 4289 |
| Message | Your party quite clearly supports the movement and has members involved with what can only be described as a criminal organisation and a cult. We're not asking for discrimination. We're asking you to respect the law. Amadeus Schmidt RP Leader |
| Date | 23:26:41, October 18, 2017 CET | From | Grüne Demokratische Partei | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 4289 |
| Message | We don't support the movement as part of party policy. We just happen to have members from CotS. We have no policies explicitly helping their cause. Cindy Kirchen Co-Leader of Pragmatismus |
| Date | 00:56:53, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Nationale Partei | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 4289 |
| Message | You yourself are a member of this criminal organisation and cult, and your party has many people associated with it. That’s ties in my book. I’d even be looking for an investigation into possible links between your party and their group. Amadeus Schmidt RP Leader |
| Date | 16:23:45, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Grüne Demokratische Partei | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 4289 |
| Message | So we should discriminate based on religion? We should kick people out for having the 'wrong religion'? Cindy Kirchen Co-Leader of Pragmatismus |
| Date | 16:54:37, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Nationale Partei | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 4289 |
| Message | No, we should kick people out for supporting a criminal cult with potentially borderline treasonous intentions. I’ve seen the report, in all it’s unredacted glory, and let me tell anyone who thinks otherwise: the rabbit hole goes a lot deeper. Regardless, we disagree with your attempts to shove Hosianism on all Dorvik. Amadeus Schmidt RP Leader |
| Date | 16:56:19, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Grüne Demokratische Partei | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 4289 |
| Message | Well if you so wish for socialism to destroy Dorvik and wish to be enablers like the DRF, so be it. You said exactly what I said. We should kick people out based on religious affiliation. Cindy Kirchen Co-Leader of Pragmatismus |
| Date | 21:21:14, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Dorvische Nationale Partei | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 4289 |
| Message | We have revised our position on this matter. Please refer to our press conference alongside our rebranding announcement for more. Amadeus Schmidt NP Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 269 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 330 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "The radical right is so homophobic that they're blaming global warming on the AIDS quilt." - Dennis Miller |