We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear War Heads Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: International Militarist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4290
Description[?]:
| We should be able to produce nuclear weaponry and use it if this this type of weapon is used against us in any way, so as to prevent countries with this equipment from easily wiping out major cities. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:43:36, October 19, 2017 CET | From |  International Militarist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear War Heads Act |
| Message | It is for national defense. |
| Date | 10:40:19, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Cildanian Labour And People's Party | To | Debating the Nuclear War Heads Act |
| Message | I Proposed A Bill Banning These Things Only 5 Years Ago. Why Do You Think Me And PDW Have Changed Our Mind. No.I Will Heavily Countering This And I Would Like PDW To Do The Same. |
| Date | 19:00:23, October 19, 2017 CET | From | International Militarist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear War Heads Act |
| Message | Why would you prevent us from using these things as a defense? It makes no sense at all. |
| Date | 19:38:19, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Cildanian Labour And People's Party | To | Debating the Nuclear War Heads Act |
| Message | These Weapons Are Barbaric The CL-DA ,PDW And PPC(Us) All Voted To Ban These Things |
| Date | 22:19:14, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Nuclear War Heads Act |
| Message | While other countries still have these weapons, it is vital for us to keep them until we can all disarm at once. |
| Date | 22:28:40, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Cildanian Labour And People's Party | To | Debating the Nuclear War Heads Act |
| Message | They Are Barbaric And We Already Voted On This |
| Date | 23:24:33, October 19, 2017 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Nuclear War Heads Act |
| Message | Simply saying they are barabric is an emotional argument and is not a legitimate argument. When you provide some facts or logical reasoning, I'll listen. Also, it doesn't matter that we already voted on this. That's the point of democracy, the laws change. |
| Date | 00:13:32, October 20, 2017 CET | From | Cildanian Labour And People's Party | To | Debating the Nuclear War Heads Act |
| Message | Facts 1. They Are Harmful To Civilians 2 Nuclear Weapons Don't Always End Wars 3 We Have A Full Time Army That Can Easily Defend Us When It Is A Matter Of National Security |
| Date | 00:27:28, October 20, 2017 CET | From | International Militarist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear War Heads Act |
| Message | I do not like nuclear weapons either but we need them until we convince other countries not to have them. |
| Date | 20:40:06, October 20, 2017 CET | From | ukenya Party | To | Debating the Nuclear War Heads Act |
| Message | instead of using nuclearwarheads diplomatic counterattacks should be used against militant nations and the nuclear budget invested in developnent |
| Date | 21:00:09, October 20, 2017 CET | From | International Militarist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear War Heads Act |
| Message | If there insane enough to shoot a nuclear bomb at us, I do not think they will negotiate. |
| Date | 21:00:14, October 20, 2017 CET | From | International Militarist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear War Heads Act |
| Message | If there insane enough to shoot a nuclear bomb at us, I do not think they will negotiate. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 224 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 76 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "The Revolution needs to progress. We as humans need to evolve into higher beings through better moral virtues. And we can achieve that if we clean ourselves from the immoral. Those who go against the Revolution, go against human progress and must be freed in the most humane way possible. That is why we introduced the guillotine." - Maximus Robertson, former Davostani revolutionary |