We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Bigger limit of the professional retirement age
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Socialist Party of Hutori
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4294
Description[?]:
We propose raising the retirement age, because the country needs more manpower and money for the own interests. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 64
Current: 64
Proposed: 67
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:56:04, October 26, 2017 CET | From | Liberal Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Bigger limit of the professional retirement age |
Message | Mr. Speaker Does the National Conservative Party have a particular age in thought for the new retirement age? Roger Kimball Minister of Finance |
Date | 22:46:04, October 26, 2017 CET | From | National Socialist Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Bigger limit of the professional retirement age |
Message | Dear Minister We are convinced, that this limit should be increased to 67 years. At the same time, we also think about citizens' rights, so three years are a little change. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 345 | |||
no | Total Seats: 109 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 59 |
Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated. |
Random quote: "Aristocracy and exclusiveness tend to final overthrow, in language as in politics." - W. D. Whitney |