Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5474
Next month in: 02:00:04
Server time: 09:59:55, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): burgerboys | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Commune of Kanjor act

Details

Submitted by[?]: PLAK

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4297

Description[?]:

Sets forth programs to kickstart Kanjors economy

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:46:21, November 02, 2017 CET
FromParti Libéral
ToDebating the Commune of Kanjor act
MessageNone of this would benefit the economy from an empirical perspective. For example, how does banning landmines help the economy, or have anything remotely to do with it? We would ask the same for missionaries and alcoholic production.

Date19:58:54, November 02, 2017 CET
FromPLAK
ToDebating the Commune of Kanjor act
MessageWe save money by not buying landmines... We save money by not allowing missionaries in our secular country.. We Earn more money by monopolizing Alcohol, all profits go to the state. This is basic economics. You liberals wouldn't know about that though.

Date23:58:26, November 02, 2017 CET
FromParti Républicain
ToDebating the Commune of Kanjor act
MessageWe fail to understand why alcohol needs to be sold by the state over the cooperatives nor why the cooperatives need to be taxed at such a high rate. These are worker owned associations, not capitalist businesses.

Date02:08:52, November 03, 2017 CET
FromParti Libéral
ToDebating the Commune of Kanjor act
MessageFor starters, the missionary law requires enforcement, and that costs money. Also missionaries have to pay taxes, and banning them would decrease revenue. This whole thing is about raising revenue isn't it? We would like to point out that the Communist Party has only attempted to do this when they've gained political ground. Could it be they are trying to gain wealth for themselves? Also anybody with a knowledge of "basic economics" would know that decreasing spending hurts the economy and certainly doesn't help it.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 174

no
 

Total Seats: 220

abstain
 

Total Seats: 256


Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra.

Random quote: "The truth is that men are tired of liberty." - Benito Mussolini

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72