We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Retirement Act 2191
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2192
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 62
Current: 60
Proposed: 75
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:51:27, February 25, 2006 CET | From | New Theta | To | Debating the Retirement Act 2191 |
Message | We propose that the individual SHOULD BE FREE to carry on working if s/he so chooses, and is physically ABLE to, for as long as possible. Or, 75, in Terra. |
Date | 01:05:58, February 26, 2006 CET | From | Progressive Darwinist Party | To | Debating the Retirement Act 2191 |
Message | agreed |
Date | 01:43:24, February 27, 2006 CET | From | Bloc Socialiste | To | Debating the Retirement Act 2191 |
Message | The medical advances that we have come upon enable people to work long beyond the current retirement age. We support. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 750 | |||||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
Random quote: "I am working for the time when unqualified blacks, browns, and women join the unqualified men in running our government." - Cissy Farenthold |