We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious Policy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4299
Description[?]:
| Freedom of cult is as necessary as it is controversial. We cannot deny citizens the right to publicly express their faith, but we can do so by maintaining the state secular. Please review this bill. We expect as much of your opinions and feedback as necessary. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards evangelism and religious advertising.
Old value:: Religions are not permitted to promote themselves or advertise in any manner whatsoever.
Current: Religions are required to obtain government approval before promoting themselves or advertising in any manner.
Proposed: Religious organizations are not permitted to actively promote themselves or advertise, however evangelism is permitted by individuals.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Religious schools are not allowed.
Current: Religious schools are not allowed.
Proposed: Any religion may set up a school, but they are strictly regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:19:46, November 06, 2017 CET | From | Democratic Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Religious Policy |
| Message | We do beg for you to review this bill carefully before voting. We will not stop pushing for religious inclusion until we can all reach a consensus. We understand our previous proposals might have deemed too extrimist. But we understand there are limits and we are willing to respect those limits as long as we can all agree that concessions in the name of freedom must be made. And we don't just refer to religion, we mean every single piece of legislation that takes this floor. We need to agree, we need to be on the same page, we need to listen to our constituents' needs and we are pushing for those who want the freedom to publicly express their faith. We appreciate your opinions and all ideologies regarding this bill will be respected. I personally apologize if I have appeared rude or insubordinate, but I am very passionate about my beliefs as we all are at the Democratic Party. Thank you. Everleigh Swinton Democratic Party Leader |
| Date | 08:58:38, November 06, 2017 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the Religious Policy |
| Message | Any legislation involving "recognized religions" is a scary threat to religious freedom. |
| Date | 17:55:39, November 06, 2017 CET | From | Democratic Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Religious Policy |
| Message | Some changes have been made on the legislation. Please check. Everleigh Swinton Democratic Party Leader |
| Date | 13:10:32, November 07, 2017 CET | From | Nationalist Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the Religious Policy |
| Message | We cannot support article 2. We would accept Article 1. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 165 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 196 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 64 |
| Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
| Random quote: "Erotic politicians, that's what we are. We're interested in anything about revolt, disorder, chaos and activity that appears to have no meaning." Jim Morrison |