Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 03:09:27
Server time: 16:50:32, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): ADM Drax | burgerboys | hexaus18 | R Drax | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Incest Policies

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Libertarian Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4299

Description[?]:

Blood relatives must not engage in any form of sexual acts because it results in the damage of our society and if pregnancy results children are born with psychological issues that don't allow them fully develop as other individuals.

We believe that incest is a crime against humanity due to the ramifications the act can have if a child is procreated, but also because it alters the natural course of human life.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:44:28, November 07, 2017 CET
FromDemocratic Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Incest Policies
MessageThis bill is to enforce the protection of social values as well as human life. Incestuous acts cannot be support by the government because they carry horrific consequences and these consequences impact on others people's lives and futures. Please support this bill and help us maintain basic human values.

Jacqueline Rosenfeld
House Party Leader

Date20:44:01, November 07, 2017 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the Incest Policies
MessageThe state should never interfere in sexual relations between consenting adults.

Date21:24:52, November 07, 2017 CET
FromDemocratic Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Incest Policies
MessageThe state should never support sexual intercourse between blood-related indidividuals

Date22:03:58, November 07, 2017 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the Incest Policies
MessageIf consanguinity is the reason, then I guess the Democratic Party is also against the reproduction of Likatonians with possible hereditary diseases, because they also "carry horrific consequences and these consequences impact on others people's lives and futures." in Ms. Rosenfeld's words.
The chances (f.y.i.: low) of diseases caused by consanguinity should never impede two people from loving each other, the same as any disability, disease or condition of anyone should never impede it.

Thalissa Wiggins
SLP House Speaker

Date01:41:49, November 08, 2017 CET
FromDemocratic Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Incest Policies
MessageThe cases of hereditary disease contracted from unions between non-related individuals is different, because it is in fact low. However when blood laces are involved the posibility of mental and/or physical disability is extremely high due to the relstive states of the reproductive cells. We respect your posture Mrs. Wiggins, but we don't agree with it. Because hereditary disease s evitable between non-relative unions, but disease is certain when related individuals procreate.

Jacqueline Rosenfeld
House Party Leader

Date01:54:36, November 08, 2017 CET
FromDemocratic Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Incest Policies
MessageAlso, Mrs. Wiggins, you say consanguinity shouldn't impede two people from loving each other and it certainly doesn't, because a father can love his child without performing sexual act with him or her.

Jacqueline Rosenfeld
House Party Leader

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 209

no
    

Total Seats: 216

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663

    Random quote: "It is a man's own mind, not his enemy or foe, that lures him to evil ways." - Buddha

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 52