We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: O.B. 01/4300: The Cannabis Morality Act of 4300
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Democratic Party of Solentia
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4301
Description[?]:
| "Mr. Speaker, The use of cannabis and other recreational drugs endangers our youth and is an abhorrent practice in general. By legalizing these drugs, our government is legitimizing and endorsing this kind of reprehensible behavior. I encourage my colleagues to vote for this bill, and end our government's endorsement of this behavior." Tim Salas Liberal Democratic Party Health and Social Services Policy Leader |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of cannabis for medicinal purposes.
Old value:: Cannabis is legal as a sedative for patients in pain.
Current: The medicinal use of cannabis is illegal.
Proposed: The medicinal use of cannabis is illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The recreational drug policy.
Old value:: The use of cannabis is legal.
Current: Recreational drug use is forbidden.
Proposed: Recreational drug use is forbidden.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:44:24, November 10, 2017 CET | From |  Austonean Social Democrats | To | Debating the O.B. 01/4300: The Cannabis Morality Act of 4300 |
| Message | This is an insane bill? Our people should have the right to use cannabis. Cannabis has been proven time and time again to be very useful in medicine and has never had a case of cannabis overdose? There is no reason to ban this. Austin Robinson Austonean Social Democrats, Chairman |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 249 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 125 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 376 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Seventy-seven percent of anti-abortion leaders are men. 100% of them will never be pregnant." - Planned Parenthood advertisement |