We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military stance on homosexuality.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Traditional Religious Party (TRP)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4301
Description[?]:
| Military stance on homosexuality. Homosexuality is allowed in the military. Alternatives: â—¦Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it. â—¦Open homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military has a "don't ask, don't tell" policy |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Current: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Proposed: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 276 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 371 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 103 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." - H. L. Mencken |