We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Simplfication of Court System
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Renew
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4304
Description[?]:
| This will clearly define where regional courts and federal courts have jurisdiction over instead of federal and local courts fighting over similar laws and rulings |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Current: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Proposed: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:21:18, November 17, 2017 CET | From | Gaduridos Progressive Movement | To | Debating the Simplfication of Court System |
| Message | The GPM think having the option to appeal a court case is very important. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 221 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 279 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
| Random quote: "Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names." - John F. Kennedy |