Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 01:10:01
Server time: 06:49:58, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: State Control Act III

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Stalinist Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2063

Description[?]:

We must entrust the power of this nation to the State, rather than allow the rich to exploit the people. The State will protect the common man, and allow them to live justly.

*I am doing it in phases in case parties agree with one but not the others*

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:08:54, June 04, 2005 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the State Control Act III
MessageNo.

Date12:47:30, June 04, 2005 CET
FromAlorian Communist Party
ToDebating the State Control Act III
MessageYes, I will agree with this bill.

Date12:53:58, June 04, 2005 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the State Control Act III
MessageI can't...

Date15:39:40, June 04, 2005 CET
FromAlorian Communist Party
ToDebating the State Control Act III
MessageTo clarify, I agree with the concept of state-owned media but not the way these Stalinists phrased it.

Date15:48:48, June 04, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the State Control Act III
MessageI think its fine having a state owned channel. Dont want to go overboard.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 115

no
     

Total Seats: 238

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "In politics, you have your word and your friends; go back on either and you're dead." - Morton C. Blackwell

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 66