We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 2191
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rightist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2192
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Patriot Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Rightist Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Rightist Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Rightist Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Patriot Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Rightist Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:06:55, February 26, 2006 CET | From | DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | 'We support.' - Archbishop Friar |
| Date | 20:05:11, February 26, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | We too will support this cabinet. We have deleted our proposal. |
| Date | 20:50:26, February 26, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | Archbishop Friar, I believe you said, and I quote, you refused "to sit in government with the GLDS"... |
| Date | 21:57:37, February 26, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | I must agree there GLDS, apparently the DaVidan Theological Party does not stand by their word whatsoever. We ask the GLDS to refrain from supporting this form of government. If you look at party records of what you ahve voted and such, you can see quite clear that you have most in common with the folllowing parties: Freedom Party, Social COnservative Party, and th e One Nation Conservatiev party. So we ask you to support us. We had hopes to bring the Davidan prophets into our government, but they apparently have no desire to do so. |
| Date | 22:09:38, February 26, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | GLDS, please do not let what the monarchist party said detract from it. I would like to hear why he said what he said but I'm willing to drop him from any cabinet level if his explaination isn't good enough. I ask that you this in the spirit of compromise. Let us hear what he has to say before you decide to support or not support this bill. |
| Date | 22:21:13, February 26, 2006 CET | From | DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | 'The remark made was not official party policy as we had not discussed the proposals in our party meetings as of yet. We disagree heavily with the GLDS on many issues, but we are willing to accept, albeit less than enthusiastically, them into a coalition with us in the interests of compromise. We realise that the public are dissatisfied with the ONCPs government and want change, and we are willing to compromise to achieve this.' - Archbishop Friar |
| Date | 15:33:09, February 27, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | hardly dissatisfief if they want me to lead the country as head of state and instate me as the second largest party. |
| Date | 16:37:59, February 27, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | Your actually the 3rd largest party ONCP. DaVidan Theological is the 2nd largest party. |
| Date | 17:04:37, February 27, 2006 CET | From | DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | 'The people only voted for you because you were slightly better than the other opponent.' - Archbishop Friar |
| Date | 17:51:58, February 27, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | And the People deservs to have a leader that is Second rate, and not the one that is the best ? As you yourself say, he is better, perhaps slightly, but still he is better then the opponent according to your view. |
| Date | 18:09:27, February 27, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | But its time to share the power instead of having one party run everything. |
| Date | 18:56:51, February 27, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | As far as i know there are three parties in the government. Aint that sharing ? When our party joined this , the pgovernment was two parties, and they ruled supreme. As they should, a government should above all be efficient. |
| Date | 19:07:43, February 27, 2006 CET | From | DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | 'The government hasn't changed out of your three parties for years. You no longer have public support.' - Archbishop Friar |
| Date | 20:47:53, February 27, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | That i admit. But we are joint second largest actually. We are level on seat numbers with theDTMP. |
| Date | 20:59:25, February 27, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2191 |
| Message | :( |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 120 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 125 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 54 |
| Random fact: Discuss flag designs at the Flag Designs thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37 |
| Random quote: "Remember that government doesn't earn one single dollar it spends. In order for you to get money from the government, that money must first be taken from somebody else." - Governor Jesse Ventura |