We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: OOC/RP: Creation of Constitutional Strength Laws
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4311
Description[?]:
| Article I: •A Constitutional Strength Law should do one of these things: i. Establish New Houses in the Congress ii. Grant powers to the Government iii. Limit what can be passed by the Government •Only Constitutional Strength Laws can cover the previous types of Laws. Article II: •Anyone may propose a Constitutional Strength Law •Laws require 2/3 of the Congress to vote in favor •These laws will require 2/3 of the Congress to repeal Article III: •The Government may not pass laws that violate these laws. •Any law found to be in violation of these laws must be voted against. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:20:28, November 30, 2017 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Creation of Constitutional Strength Laws |
| Message | (OOC) This is my Proposal so we don’t have to go through the trouble of creating a whole Constitutional Document so this will replace it, thoughts? |
| Date | 14:52:12, November 30, 2017 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Creation of Constitutional Strength Laws |
| Message | This will be a great step forward towards achieving full government transparency and direct democracy for the people. We hope that by implementing Constitutional Strength Laws, we can create another house of congress so as to further advance the will of the people |
| Date | 20:14:19, November 30, 2017 CET | From | Beluzian Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Creation of Constitutional Strength Laws |
| Message | OOC:I oppose, and will break any of these laws how i see fit, you brojke my agreement to leave election time as 24 months. |
| Date | 05:58:42, December 01, 2017 CET | From | Republican Renewal Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Creation of Constitutional Strength Laws |
| Message | OOC: i'm interested to see where this would go even though I would support us writing an RP constitution. |
| Date | 06:01:34, December 01, 2017 CET | From | Republican Renewal Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Creation of Constitutional Strength Laws |
| Message | OOC: I want a new house of congress so I will support it. (I support the creation of an indirectly elected senate with equal representation per state). also a question, if this were passed how would it be elected, and would it have any effect on our ability to pass normal laws or only rp laws or would it make an rp requirement to pass in the new house for it to be passed in the Congress? |
| Date | 06:12:15, December 01, 2017 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Creation of Constitutional Strength Laws |
| Message | OOC: The only way for a new house of congress to be elected is by RP. There are no functions in game that allow for an implementation of another house of congress |
| Date | 12:22:34, December 01, 2017 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Creation of Constitutional Strength Laws |
| Message | (OOC) We Could model it after several other existing bicameral legislatures, and ask for them to offer assistance in creating it, or we could wing it and hope for the best. |
| Date | 12:35:42, December 01, 2017 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Creation of Constitutional Strength Laws |
| Message | OOC: The aforementioned point is better. Winging it will just end up in everything being a disaster |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 527 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 223 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page |
| Random quote: "I am a conservative to preserve all that is good in our constitution, a radical to remove all that is bad. I seek to preserve property and to respect order, and I equally decry the appeal to the passions of the many or the prejudices of the few." - Benjamin Disraeli |