We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nominating Sir Janus Hartmann III of the KWRF to be Vice President of Beluzia
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4311
Description[?]:
| “As the KWRF is the 3rd largest party, and we already nominated a member from the largest, we think it’s fair to nominate a member of one of the largest party. As such we nominate Sir Janus Hartmann III to become the second and final Vice President of Beluzia, now in orders of succession the first appointed Vice President will succeed me in case i am unable to preform my duties, followed by Sir Janus Hartmann III, then the normal line of succession as outlined in the Government Proceedings Act.” President John Fredrickson |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:14:05, November 30, 2017 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Nominating Sir Janus Hartmann III of the KWRF to be Vice President of Beluzia |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We thank President Frederickson for appointing one of the party's political greats to the second highest post of the land. With a long stint as Second Deputy General Secretary and Speaker of the National Congress, and with outstanding foreign policy, economic credentials, we have no doubt in our mind that Sir Janus will make Beluzia great again. |
| Date | 20:42:38, November 30, 2017 CET | From | Republican Renewal Party | To | Debating the Nominating Sir Janus Hartmann III of the KWRF to be Vice President of Beluzia |
| Message | OOC: why not |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 527 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 122 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 101 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom." - Friedrich Hayek |