Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 03:03:29
Server time: 12:56:30, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The New Professional Retirement Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Conservative Unionists Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 4311

Description[?]:

The Conservative Unionists Party feels that it is necessary for the retirement age to be lowered to 62. From the age of 60 onwards, workers are beginning to become less able to work to the full potential of companies requirements therefore we feel that this retirement age should be lowered in order to create more job vacancies for younger people who are more able to work to an excellent requirement.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:10:54, November 30, 2017 CET
FromNational Democratic Party
ToDebating the The New Professional Retirement Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

The National Democratic Party will fully support this bill once it goes to vote.

John Miller
Leader of the National Democratic Party

Date23:13:59, November 30, 2017 CET
FromThe Conservative Unionists Party
ToDebating the The New Professional Retirement Act
MessageDear Mr Miller,

On behalf of the Conservative Unionists Party, we thank you for your decision to support our cause. We are currently awaiting for some of the other political parties to debate this topic before it goes to vote.

William Sharp
Leader of the Conservative Unionists Party

Date23:35:31, November 30, 2017 CET
FromGreen Party
ToDebating the The New Professional Retirement Act
MessageGreen Party is supporting this proposal

Date03:08:01, December 02, 2017 CET
FromWorkers' Party
ToDebating the The New Professional Retirement Act
MessageWe are a party that supports all workers rights. Why should old people who wish to continue working be forced out of their jobs? This is worse than being fired; at least firing is done because the worker is considered to be unskilled. Skilled workers of some age will be discriminated with this bill.

Date09:10:54, December 02, 2017 CET
FromNational Democratic Party
ToDebating the The New Professional Retirement Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

Compulsory retirement is not being proposed - what is being proposed is an earlier retirement age, allowing workers to retire earlier with the same benefits.

John Miller
Leader of the National Democratic Party

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 206

no
 

Total Seats: 208

abstain
   

Total Seats: 336


Random fact: By default the head of government is the ultimate authority within a national government. In general terms, heads of government are expected to consult with cabinet colleagues (including those from other parties) before making significant decisions but they remain responsible for government action.

Random quote: "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood." - Universal Declaration of Human Rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58