Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 01:06:26
Server time: 06:53:33, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Pensions

Details

Submitted by[?]: Telamon Social Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2193

Description[?]:

We wish to highlight that this bill does not ban individuals from saving a private pension. It merely removes the bond between the public and the private systems.

The law clearly states that "state operates a compulsory public system COMBINED with an optional private pension" [my emphasis]. This we take to refer to a system where the state somehow regulates the optional private pensions so that they form a overall pension system that has a public and a private part. In some countries this takes for example the form of tax incentives that are linked to certain features of the private pension plans (retirement age etc.).

We have nothing against anyone up for retirement, quite the contrary. We simply wish to keep separate whatever means people wish to save money for their retirement and the public compulsory pension system. I see no way that saving up for retirement could (and we mean could in the sense of being able to) be banned as it is simply a form of saving. You can still save for your pension, the state just takes no interest in it.

We do not have any legislation that limits the kind of insurance companies are permitted to sell (including pension scemes) and we have no limitations to the use of bank accounts or stock and bond investments. Thus we can not see how the proposed legislation could possibly mean banning private saving for retirement. It simply states that the state takes no position on any private pensions plans and operates a public, compulsory one.

We could understand other interpretations in the matter if the bill 1) specifically banned private saving for pensions, 2) if our legislation had any means of preventing it in the first place.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 38

no
     

Total Seats: 272

abstain
 

Total Seats: 30


Random fact: It is forbidden to impersonate a player or Moderator.

Random quote: “Human rights means doing whatever the fuck you want” - Benji Benandez, former Dranian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 36