Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 02:08:14
Server time: 05:51:45, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of June 4315

Details

Submitted by[?]: Whig Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4316

Description[?]:

The Whig Party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Commonwealth of Rutania. We have embarked upon year after year of deficit spending and therefore we recommend a small increase in the national sales tax in effort to end deficit spending.

This budget proposes reductions to the Health and Social Services budget due to savings from ending the policy of providing free pharmaceutical drugs to all citizens:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=547569

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 370

no
   

Total Seats: 380

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left.

    Random quote: "Capitalism and communism stand at opposite poles. Their essential difference is this: the communist, seeing the rich man and his fine home, says: 'No man should have so much.' The capitalist, seeing the same thing, says: 'All men should have as much.'" - Phelps Adams

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 36