We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Withdraw from the Dundorf-Kanjor Friendship Treaty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nationale Arbeiterpartei-Volksfront
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4319
Description[?]:
| While the NAP-VF defines itself as an internationalist party, we really see no point in this treaty, as it benefits neither party involved, and could work to the detriment of our nation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Dundorf-Kanjor Friendship Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:10:47, December 14, 2017 CET | From | Nationale Arbeiterpartei-Volksfront | To | Debating the Withdraw from the Dundorf-Kanjor Friendship Treaty |
| Message | We leave this open to debate. |
| Date | 14:49:50, December 15, 2017 CET | From | Dundorfnationale Volkspartei | To | Debating the Withdraw from the Dundorf-Kanjor Friendship Treaty |
| Message | This would appear a pact of non-aggression and pro-trade, therefore if we left surely that would have a negative impact on trade although admittedly in any case we're unlikely to go to war with a nation on the other side of the planet. |
| Date | 15:05:01, December 15, 2017 CET | From | Nationale Arbeiterpartei-Volksfront | To | Debating the Withdraw from the Dundorf-Kanjor Friendship Treaty |
| Message | We feel that Dundorf is unlikely to benefit from trade due to this treaty, due to the distance between our nations. The NAP-VF would much rather foster pan-Artanian sentiments. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 205 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 199 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 96 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "It is vain to talk of the interest of the community, without understanding what is the interest of the individual" - Jeremy Bentham |