Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 01:06:27
Server time: 10:53:32, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): itsjustgav | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Paramilitary Policy

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Left Party - Equality First

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 4319

Description[?]:

_

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:24:13, December 16, 2017 CET
FromAnarchist Socialist Party
ToDebating the Paramilitary Policy
MessageThe party has a right to defend itself from other parties and the state, if necessary!

Johann Peterson
Representative of the Anarchist Socialist Party

Date20:16:52, December 16, 2017 CET
FromRepublican Centrist Alliance
ToDebating the Paramilitary Policy
MessageDear god what has happend to this once great nation. Allowing paramilitary organisations for political parties, why? Are we in such a state of turmoil that we can't trust the police, both federal and local. Or the justice system, so we must instead form political gangs with drive-bys and what not. To protect our politicians. We are on a dark and dangerous road towards dictatorship in this country.

The Republican Centrist Alliance condems the goverment and President Erwin (who never seems to grow old and die) for pushing this kind of disgusting anti-democratic agenda.

James Hancock
Party Chairman of the Republican Centrist Alliance.

Date23:19:20, December 16, 2017 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the Paramilitary Policy
MessageThis is a disgusting policy. This is condoning ideological terrorism. We can't but frontally reject any kind of violence, and much more vehemently if it is grounded on ideological reasons. This is a disgusting move that makes our government coalition walk on thin ice, Ms. Erwin.

Ariana Ortega
Secretary of Homeland Security of Likatonia
Leader of the Social Liberal Party

Date10:21:36, December 17, 2017 CET
FromUnited Left Party - Equality First
ToDebating the Paramilitary Policy
MessageWe are and has always been a militant party. We are however currently not seeking to initiate any form of revolution or uprising, we proposed this bill mostly becuse we don't trust the army or police to defend the public from right-wing extremists.

Date13:38:59, December 17, 2017 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the Paramilitary Policy
MessageWith this bill what you are doing is legalizing right-wing extremist and violent groups, don't you see? Currently the police can stop them. After this passes, they can't! We are freaking out that so many parties support turning our civilized nation into a violent society ruled by the strongest, most intimidating group.

The Likatonian citizens have for a very long time put their trust on you. They have trusted their safety and security on you by giving you the rule of the police and army - the former you have delegated on me for the sake of coalition crafting, but the latter is controlled by your party colleague Ms. Watkins. And yet you can't trust her or me to do the right thing when it is needed? If it is such a concern to you, why didn't you keep Homeland Security for a ULP-EF member? This is nuts. You are putting your government in jeopardy for the sake accomplishing the wishes of the neo-nazis.

Ariana Ortega
Secretary of Homeland Security of Likatonia
Leader of the Social Liberal Party

Date15:40:25, December 17, 2017 CET
FromUnited Left Party - Equality First
ToDebating the Paramilitary Policy
MessageWe agree wih you, we cannot und our damage, but we'll join the no block.

Date17:02:06, December 17, 2017 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the Paramilitary Policy
MessageWe are very relieved about the change of mind of the United Left Party and the Anarchist Socialist Party. It is very good news that violence based on ideological reasons will still be outlawed in our nation, and it is great news that we are part of a government with such open mind and with an open-eared leader such as President Erwin. We will continue to fight for the freedom and civil liberties of our citizens from their government.

Ariana Ortega
Secretary of Homeland Security of Likatonia
Leader of the Social Liberal Party

Date17:24:31, December 17, 2017 CET
FromUnited Left Party - Equality First
ToDebating the Paramilitary Policy
MessageYes, but we still support the legalization of left-wing paramilitary groups.

Date17:25:43, December 17, 2017 CET
FromUnited Left Party - Equality First
ToDebating the Paramilitary Policy
MessageAnd thank you for your good words Ariana, we are glad that we can co-operate and reason despite our differences.
-President Mary Erwin

Date17:52:07, December 17, 2017 CET
FromRepublican Centrist Alliance
ToDebating the Paramilitary Policy
MessageSo you would support a private army just for yourself. Wow.

James Hancock
Party Chairman of the Republican Centrist Alliance.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 107

no
    

Total Seats: 273

abstain
 

Total Seats: 45


Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play".

Random quote: "You can't get rid of poverty by giving people money." - P. J. O'Rourke

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66