We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: New Welfare Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Popular Progressive Party of Pontesi
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4321
Description[?]:
New regulations. - Retirement age decreased of 2 years - Now all families can access the child benefit - Enacted reintegration projects - Now pensions are completely public. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 60
Current: 75
Proposed: 58
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding child benefit.
Old value:: The state guarantees child benefit to families classified as low-income or poor.
Current: The state guarantees child benefit to families classified as low-income or poor.
Proposed: The state guarantees child benefit to all families.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Homeless shelters and reintegration projects
Old value:: There are government-run shelters, but these coexist with privately run shelters.
Current: There are government-run shelters, but these coexist with privately run shelters.
Proposed: The government runs all homeless shelters and reintegration projects
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Current: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Proposed: The state operates a compulsory, public pension system.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:35:23, December 20, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Capitalist Party of Pontesi | To | Debating the New Welfare Bill |
Message | article 1: the age of 60 is already to low, decreasing would be a terrible idea. 2: The richer families do not need child benefits, we should use the money we don't give to them to better help to poorest. 3: Privately run shelters help the national one, there is no reason to get rid of them. 4: Private pensions again should be legal. Therefor, I am against every one of these proposals. |
Date | 18:31:40, December 20, 2017 CET | From | Popular Progressive Party of Pontesi | To | Debating the New Welfare Bill |
Message | Replying to Point 1: The retirement age of 60 was too high for workers with heavy duties Replying to Point 2: All families, proportionally based on income, they should receive the "Child Benefit" Replying to Point 3: The private sector did not fund any rehabilitation program, this reform introduces these programs. Replying to Point 4: There is nothing wrong with retirees receiving a pension from the state |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 280 | ||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players are expected to play the game independently and should not share their passwords or allow others to access their accounts. |
Random quote: "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, from those who are cold and are not clothed. The world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children." - Dwight D. Eisenhower |