Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 02:45:58
Server time: 17:14:01, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ADM Drax | itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Sensible Approach to Federal Responsibilities

Details

Submitted by[?]: Lutte Féministe de Libération

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2194

Description[?]:

Building defense huts should be something for local governments to be concerned about.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:28:33, March 02, 2006 CET
FromLibertarian Socialist Party (RDL)
ToDebating the Sensible Approach to Federal Responsibilities
MessageSupport

Date15:20:22, March 02, 2006 CET
From Mouvement des Conservateurs
ToDebating the Sensible Approach to Federal Responsibilities
MessageMaking defence a federal responsibility sounds a bit unrealistic to us, by that we would focus that matter on certain districts or communities which makes it harder get a decent national security.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 155

no
    

Total Seats: 409

abstain
 

Total Seats: 17


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker).

Random quote: "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber." - Plato

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48