We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sensible Approach to Federal Responsibilities
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lutte Féministe de Libération
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2194
Description[?]:
Building defense huts should be something for local governments to be concerned about. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Current: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Proposed: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:28:33, March 02, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Socialist Party (RDL) | To | Debating the Sensible Approach to Federal Responsibilities |
Message | Support |
Date | 15:20:22, March 02, 2006 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Sensible Approach to Federal Responsibilities |
Message | Making defence a federal responsibility sounds a bit unrealistic to us, by that we would focus that matter on certain districts or communities which makes it harder get a decent national security. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 155 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 409 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 17 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
Random quote: "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber." - Plato |