Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5471
Next month in: 02:38:26
Server time: 21:21:33, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Interstellar. | Jimmy_G_3 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: International maritime law/Law of the Sea

Details

Submitted by[?]: Cooperative Commonwealth Federation

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2063

Description[?]:

An act to govern territorial waters.

Lodamun ratifies the Law of the Sea, which asserts:

-- Absolute jurisdiction (Exclusive Economic Zone) of 100km from the shore, where this zone does not overlap with that of another country.

-- Transient jurisdiction (Transit and Harvesting Zone) of 500km from the shore, where this zone does not overlap with that of another country.

-- Where zones meet or overlap, the border shall be set at the median (halfway) line between land masses. For neighbouring countries, sea borders should extend perpendicular to the coast.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:21:02, June 04, 2005 CET
FromChorus of Amyst
ToDebating the International maritime law/Law of the Sea
MessageGiven the Council's objection to the World Court bill, we do not feel that we can support this at this time.

Date22:45:15, June 04, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the International maritime law/Law of the Sea
MessageActually, given that the World Court does not yet exist, that clause has been removed form the bill.

Here's what we get from this:

-- international recognition of our territorial waters from other states signing the law of the sea convention
-- economic jurisdiction to 500 km, a very large zone
-- territorial waters extend at 90 degree angles from our coastline, guaranteeing larger ocean areas under our jurisdiction
-- stability in international waters through a codeified system of border delineation, thus reducing potential international disputes

Date01:41:23, June 05, 2005 CET
FromChorus of Amyst
ToDebating the International maritime law/Law of the Sea
MessageThe Council will support this under the condition that other nations pledge to accept such a system of border delineation. Otherwise, it's rather useless to state where our borders are.

Date01:56:08, June 05, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the International maritime law/Law of the Sea
MessageIt's been ratified by a number of nations and is being debated in others. It establishes a claim and ensures that other signatories will recognize that claim.

Date01:57:10, June 05, 2005 CET
FromChorus of Amyst
ToDebating the International maritime law/Law of the Sea
MessageIs there a place to view the original act then, or the signatory nations, at least?

Date02:50:24, June 05, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the International maritime law/Law of the Sea
MessageYup. Thread is at: http://www.takeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=604&mforum=particracy

Date16:41:03, June 05, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the International maritime law/Law of the Sea
MessageThe 2nd June Movement is of course entitled to its views and to vote any way it sees fit, but may we with the greatest possible respect ask the reasons for its opposition? We are hoping to learn something about the foreign policy of the PACF parties.

Date18:03:46, June 05, 2005 CET
FromChorus of Amyst
ToDebating the International maritime law/Law of the Sea
MessageThe Council has discussed the matter and has decided to pledge support as long as the World Court is not involved and as long as we are able to withdraw from the treaty if disagreeable changes occur.

Date21:06:29, June 05, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the International maritime law/Law of the Sea
MessageAn international law requires an international police force and an international judiciary. We cannot support the law without supporting at least the concept of the other two, which we do not.

If Jack Smith, of Timbuktu, fishes in "our" waters because his dad and his grandmother, his aunt and his nephew have fished there since forever, that's ok by us. If the fleet of the Corporate Fishing Services, operating in international waters with its radar and spotter planes, bags entire immature shoals which traditionally migrate to the Lodamun coast, that's very seriously not ok with us.

Date00:54:27, June 06, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the International maritime law/Law of the Sea
MessageAgreed. Jack Smith may do as he pleases, but international corporations must not over-fish our waters -- or those of any other state. International law, however, may operate by common consent, and does not requite any policing beyond that which can be done by the coast guard of each state.

Date01:15:01, June 06, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the International maritime law/Law of the Sea
MessageInternational law, however, would sanction, by omission, the fishing to exhaustion of international waters.

Date01:16:25, June 06, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the International maritime law/Law of the Sea
MessageFair enough. That can be tackled next, once this takes effect.

Date01:24:19, June 06, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the International maritime law/Law of the Sea
MessageWe should argue for it to be included and suspend joining until it is.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 225

no
   

Total Seats: 140

abstain
 

Total Seats: 50


Random fact: You can view helpful ideological statistics about the regions in your nation on the region pages. You can also view detailed political opinions and the importance of them there as well.

Random quote: "I am loyal to the ideas, not to the institutions." - Cyro Aquila, former Selucian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59