We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Council of Ministers Proposal of May 4333 (Anti-fascist alliance)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Soziale Gegenseitigkeitspartei
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4334
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Neue Ära
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Neue Ära
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Freie Demokratische Union
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Soziale Gegenseitigkeitspartei
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Volkspartei für Freiheit und Demokratie
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Soziale Gegenseitigkeitspartei
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Volkspartei für Freiheit und Demokratie
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Neue Ära
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Freie Demokratische Union
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Freie Demokratische Union
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Volkspartei für Freiheit und Demokratie
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Neue Ära
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Soziale Gegenseitigkeitspartei
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:53:28, January 14, 2018 CET | From | Soziale Gegenseitigkeitspartei | To | Debating the Council of Ministers Proposal of May 4333 (Anti-fascist alliance) |
| Message | We hereby propose a 4 way alliance against the fascist right, to minimize the damage they can inflict on our country. This will prevent our country from regressing into the bad old days, and will strike a new path for Dorvik. Elly Vogt SGP Leader |
| Date | 22:00:52, January 14, 2018 CET | From | Hosian-Konservative Allianz | To | Debating the Council of Ministers Proposal of May 4333 (Anti-fascist alliance) |
| Message | The SNP has always appreciated being called fascist, when we are the farthest thing from it. Can you provide some examples where the Social Nationalist Party is fascist? We'd be incredibly interested. Johannes Augustus von Rohr-Mauss, Chairman of the Social Nationalist Party |
| Date | 22:01:49, January 14, 2018 CET | From | Neue Ära | To | Debating the Council of Ministers Proposal of May 4333 (Anti-fascist alliance) |
| Message | As would we. Hanna Wu, Minister of Finance-elect |
| Date | 22:04:20, January 14, 2018 CET | From | Volkspartei für Freiheit und Demokratie | To | Debating the Council of Ministers Proposal of May 4333 (Anti-fascist alliance) |
| Message | A stirling proposal. We will support this! Katarina Riemann MSC Deputy chancellor of the republic of Dorvik |
| Date | 22:15:50, January 14, 2018 CET | From | Soziale Gegenseitigkeitspartei | To | Debating the Council of Ministers Proposal of May 4333 (Anti-fascist alliance) |
| Message | Herr Rohr-Mauss, You have a history of proposing bills which restrict the rights of the citizens of Dorvik, and you seem very interested in restoring elements of the old hierarchy. You believe that the government should be involved in regulating someone's personal morality, including government control over religion. Your party certainly displays elements of the fascist right. You may not be imposing restrictions on a racial basis, but you seem strongly in favor of controlling people on a religious one, as well as (judging by your party affiliations) re-implementing nobility and increasing the power of the monarchy. Elly Vogt SGP Leader |
| Date | 22:22:50, January 14, 2018 CET | From | Neue Ära | To | Debating the Council of Ministers Proposal of May 4333 (Anti-fascist alliance) |
| Message | Herr Vogt, Re-implimenting the monarchy and nobility are not signs of fascism, are you accusing my family of being from a fascist background? Simply because we bare noble titles as the Lords and Barons of Traisheim? Hanna Wu |
| Date | 22:24:59, January 14, 2018 CET | From | Hosian-Konservative Allianz | To | Debating the Council of Ministers Proposal of May 4333 (Anti-fascist alliance) |
| Message | OOC: As a note, those were visibility bills, I don't really count them among my party ideology. I feel that should be taken into account or I should've made that known. The nobility in Dorvik serves a vital cultural role, we have never attempted to restore the King of Dorvik to the throne, the King of Dorvik remains a pretender to throne. We remain chiefly republican in our role of government, we have at times combated monarchist movements. Just because our party is affiliated with members who are members of the nobility, does that mean they should be discriminated against? We have made no attempts to place nobles in a position above anyone else, simply that those who have titles can use them due to their ancestral connection to Dorvik and her people. As previously mentioned, our role on religion is that it is private (with those bills being in mind that they're visibility bills) and the state should only object when a religion present a clear and present danger to public order. Johannes Augustus von Rohr-Mauss, Chairman of the SNP |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 144 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 359 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 96 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made" - Otto von Bismark |