Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 00:13:10
Server time: 11:46:49, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): New Thought | RogueALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: OOC/RP: 2nd Great Terran War

Details

Submitted by[?]: Soziale Gegenseitigkeitspartei

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4340

Description[?]:

The RP forums are currently in the planning stages of the 2nd Great Terra War. Currently every participating nation is working out alliances and party support.

*As far as I can tell*, Dorvik is not yet involved in this war in any capacity.

OOC: We're not technically a militarist party, but still, I think the RP could be good fun. I'm assuming there will be some way as to which we could pick sides on some ideological battle. Dorvik is a well connected nation, with several allies. It is also one nation involved in an international conflict that could spark some interesting situations. All in all, I think this could be an interesting change of pace.

Strawpoll from the thread proposing reasons for conflict: http://www.strawpoll.me/14754556

--------------------------Text of the authorization bill----------------------------------------

Link to OOC forum thread for info on the war: viewtopic.php?f=18&t=7739&p=126768#p126768

In Accordance with Rule 23.1, which states:

"23.1 Role-play events between nations, such as wars, will be officially recognised if before they are commenced, in all of the concerned nations a RP event bill outlining the event is approved by a 2/3rds majority of all players with seats (not just those with seats who vote) and over 50% of the seats in the legislature. This bill must specify the necessary and possible consequences of the role-play event, as well as a clause that deals with the eventuality of one or more players becoming absent for more than a specified time, and how such an absence is to be interpreted in in-game terms."

All Parties voting for this OOC RP Resolution consent to participation of Dorvik in the "Particracy's World War RP" found at: viewtopic.php?f=18&t=7740, specifically along the lines outlined in the fully updated and amended Original Post of that Thread. This thread outlines the necessary and possible consequences of the role-play event. Dorvik reserves the right to ignore "shoot" RPs where they adversely effect Dorvik or the overall RP and which are not planned out in advance between Dorvik and one or more other players, and Dorvik agrees not to "shoot" RPs on its own, but to stick with the "booked" angles, generally in line with the events described in the thread.

According to the rules, this resolution will bind all players in Dorvik to conduct the RP through the duration, or until such time as Dorvik sues for peace in RP. It may only be passed by 2/3rds of all active RL players in Dorvik who also have seats, and then only if that number is more than 50% of the IG Legislature.

If Dorvik's players do not RP for more than 7 RL days without prior notice, it shall be assumed that Dorvik's Government IG has fallen and Dorvik will immediately be considered to have sued for peace under terms favorable to Dorvik's opponents, but which in no way otherwise pose an existential threat to Dorvik's national integrity or sovereignty. In this event Dorvik agrees to accept the terms of the surrender, which will remain binding on Dorvik until a RL player returns to renegotiate the terms. In the event of a surrender, Dorvik may not rejoin the RP at a later time.

This resolution will take effect immediately upon receiving the requisite number of votes, and the actual passage of the bill will serve as ratification.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:48:48, January 16, 2018 CET
FromBuntjogad Jezhrje'konak'aerz
ToDebating the OOC/RP: 2nd Great Terran War
MessageOOC: I'll just add what I got as NM and as the primary RPer in Dorvik.

We were planned to be THE spark point for this war due to the Valruzian conflict, but that is no longer an option.

I was to an extent involved in the planning of the war, and the Valruzian RP was to some extent a way to spark the war off.

As I say, this RP's death pretty much has killed Dorvik's place in the RP up to this point as far as I know.

That's really all I can say, hope it was of help.

- Pragma / QV

Date17:54:48, January 16, 2018 CET
FromFreie Demokratische Union
ToDebating the OOC/RP: 2nd Great Terran War
MessageOOC:-Yes agree with Pragma.The Valruzian RP could not,in my opinion as well,be a reason to stimulate the War.We must look at other options

Date19:01:00, January 16, 2018 CET
FromSoziale Gegenseitigkeitspartei
ToDebating the OOC/RP: 2nd Great Terran War
MessageOOC: There are other tensions, such as Valruzia vs Saridan, Istalia+Malivia vs Narikaton+Darnussia, Trigunia vs Hutori, a potential Dundorfian civil war, plus a potential race fueled conflict in Aldegar

Date00:42:25, January 28, 2018 CET
From Moderation
ToDebating the OOC/RP: 2nd Great Terran War
MessageOOC Archiving

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 484

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain
   

Total Seats: 115


Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass.

Random quote: "Global warming, at least the modern nightmare vision, is a myth. I am sure of it and so are a growing number of scientists. But what is really worrying is that the world's politicians and policy makers are not." - David Bellamy

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55