We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Death Penalty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Jacobin Society
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2195
Description[?]:
"It promises that 60% of the time, it works all the time." "That doesn't even make sense." |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy with respect to the death penalty.
Old value:: The death penalty is applied for capital crimes.
Current: The death penalty is illegal and is never to be applied.
Proposed: The death penalty is illegal and is never to be applied.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:40:00, March 03, 2006 CET | From | Civic Platform | To | Debating the Death Penalty |
Message | no |
Date | 06:02:09, March 04, 2006 CET | From | Party for the Promotion of Pandas | To | Debating the Death Penalty |
Message | yes |
Date | 09:17:14, March 04, 2006 CET | From | Bachelor Party | To | Debating the Death Penalty |
Message | We strongly oppose. |
Date | 22:10:36, March 04, 2006 CET | From | Party for the Promotion of Pandas | To | Debating the Death Penalty |
Message | i kinda feel sorry for all the criminals on death row right now. With each election is coming a regime change that supports the death penalty, doesnt support the death penalty, supports, doesnt. although it doesnt look like it changed quite enough this time.... |
Date | 00:21:18, March 05, 2006 CET | From | New Daio Party | To | Debating the Death Penalty |
Message | ::insert riot-like sound as the party debates this issue:: |
Date | 07:00:55, March 05, 2006 CET | From | Jacobin Society | To | Debating the Death Penalty |
Message | RUCKUS!!! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 126 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 128 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 79 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "Public schools are government-established, politician- and bureaucrat-controlled, fully politicized, taxpayer-supported, authoritarian socialist institutions. In fact, the public-school system is one of the purest examples of socialism existing in America." - Thomas L. Johnson |