We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: no to nukes..well, a small yes if we really need them
Details
Submitted by[?]: Gil's Green party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2195
Description[?]:
| a less agressive stance on nukes |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons if victory is not feasibile by other means.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:19:00, March 03, 2006 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the no to nukes..well, a small yes if we really need them |
| Message | Support. |
| Date | 17:00:19, March 04, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian League | To | Debating the no to nukes..well, a small yes if we really need them |
| Message | the potential of immediate Nuclear War is a great deterrent for outside aggression. Considering the history of Lodamun, I have to vote no. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 84 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 77 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 40 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "The people who vote decide nothing. The people who count the vote decide everything." - Joseph Stalin |