We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Don't F*ck With Us Act 2194
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2195
Description[?]:
| Name says it all. If communication and understanding does not save our people from outside attacks then we must use any other means necessary. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in retaliation to any attack.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:45:21, March 04, 2006 CET | From | Bloc Socialiste | To | Debating the Don't F*ck With Us Act 2194 |
| Message | The Tonton Militia does not feel comfortable with the possibility that the government could launch nuclear attacks against its own people if we begin to agitate. We oppose on the grounds that human rights are violated by weapons such as these. |
| Date | 19:35:57, March 04, 2006 CET | From | New Theta | To | Debating the Don't F*ck With Us Act 2194 |
| Message | Uneasy lies the head that wears a guilty conscience... |
| Date | 19:49:03, March 04, 2006 CET | From | New Theta | To | Debating the Don't F*ck With Us Act 2194 |
| Message | There's a certain irony present when someone so obviously militaristic, what with his own private army, votes for pacificism. |
| Date | 14:45:19, March 05, 2006 CET | From | Plaid Draddwyr | To | Debating the Don't F*ck With Us Act 2194 |
| Message | We don't feel comfortable that the Tonton Militia exists. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 408 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 132 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 210 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "Capitalism is what people do if you leave them alone" - Kenneth Minogue |