We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: RP-Law: Constitutional Amendment: Highest Court of Justice Act: Modification of Article 3.3
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4351
Description[?]:
This Amendment will modify, Article 3.3 of the Highest Court of Justice Act (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=553251). The purpose of this amendment is to prevent future deadlocks within the court, since there are 8 votes total. The President of the Court deserves this extra power, as they are the leader of the court. Article 1. Article 3.3 of the Highest Court of Justice Act (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=553251) will be be changed to, "3.3 The first judge does have three votes. All other judges only have one vote." Article 2. This is a constitutional amendment and requires a two-thirds (2/3) majority to pass. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 80 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 249 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 221 |
Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
Random quote: "The key to understanding the American system is to imagine that you have the power to make nearly any law you want, but your worst enemy will be the one to enforce it." - Rick Cook |