Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 02:39:37
Server time: 21:20:22, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Autokrator30 | hexaus18 | Sevenberry | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Devolution Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Independent Capitalist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2195

Description[?]:

Something we must have missed before while devolving almost everything...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:01:21, March 05, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Libertarian Alorian Party
ToDebating the Devolution Act
MessageMore legal fragmentation? Clear no from us!

Date04:46:47, March 05, 2006 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Devolution Act
MessageAnd you have 0 seats. The confederates are in power now. We will work for the common good of Aloria.

Date06:39:55, March 05, 2006 CET
FromMonarchist Party
ToDebating the Devolution Act
MessageWe wish ICP to cease their running from one side of the issue to the other in his vain attempt to catch the reins that they let slip. The 'confederates' may be in the majority, but are not so simply defined, especially not in order to make your little self feel good by crushing someone 'weaker' than yourself. You don't have the common good of Aloria in mind, only your rear end on the seat of the Head of Government.

Date13:34:47, March 05, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Libertarian Alorian Party
ToDebating the Devolution Act
Message"We will work for the common good of Aloria." Every party could say that, eh?
I do not see the sense in legal fragmentation. It is so horribly unelegant! Also it is another legislative layer which ceases to help efficiency of the state.

Date18:29:59, March 05, 2006 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Devolution Act
Message"You don't have the common good of Aloria in mind, only your rear end on the seat of the Head of Government."

I never aimed for Head of Government, I was never in that spot. I may have been HoS for a while, but that is because the people elected me there and HoS is less powerful than HoG. SRP has had HoG for a while. Please know your history before you print libel.

"I do not see the sense in legal fragmentation. It is so horribly unelegant! Also it is another legislative layer which ceases to help efficiency of the state."

Easy to say, but you voted no on centralization: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=55755

According to your philosophy would it not be better to centralize, even if you disagree at first, and then attempt to fix the laws?

Date00:00:11, March 06, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Libertarian Alorian Party
ToDebating the Devolution Act
MessageThere are few too many flaws, IMHO. But I'll consider changing my vote.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 395

no
    

Total Seats: 203

abstain
 

Total Seats: 2


Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

Random quote: "The Lord is a man of war" - Exodus 15:3

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57