Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5471
Next month in: 00:56:05
Server time: 03:03:54, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Arusu-Weareback | ImperialLodamun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Environmental Protection Act, 4355

Details

Submitted by[?]: Haaretz (הארץ)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4357

Description[?]:

This act is designed to protect the natural beauty of Beiteynu.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:02:01, March 01, 2018 CET
FromMiflaga Libralit Beiteynu
ToDebating the The Environmental Protection Act, 4355
MessageMy party hereby declares it's opposition to the aforementioned bill on the grounds that such bill would constitute a threat to the economic freedoms that my community relies on.

Date07:30:07, March 02, 2018 CET
FromHaaretz (הארץ)
ToDebating the The Environmental Protection Act, 4355
MessageThe threat to human life posed by unregulated pesticide/chemical use is at least as valid as the "threat" posed by minor regulations such as these. That's not to mention the threat to natural life posed by unregulated hunting and fishing.

Other than those two provisions (one that protects the populace, another that protects nature), the rest of this bill has little/nothing to do with "economic freedoms." You are still free to purchase any car you wish. Private companies still control their own waste. If the people of Herut could think critically about the impact of these proposals, they would recognize how little they actually impact private business.

Date18:13:02, March 02, 2018 CET
FromKadima Beiteynu
ToDebating the The Environmental Protection Act, 4355
MessageMy party is fine with articles 1&2. We aren't so keen on the others, especially 4&5. We oppose all corporate welfare, including tax incentives that favor a particular product. Also, there are already privately owned recycling centers. Nationalizing them isn't going to help anyone. They give people money in exchange for their junk. We shouldn't make it so that they take people's junk and take people's money through tax funding.

Date19:53:22, March 02, 2018 CET
FromHaaretz (הארץ)
ToDebating the The Environmental Protection Act, 4355
MessageNoted. Articles 4 & 5 have been removed, and we will proceed to a vote.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 36

no
  

Total Seats: 67

abstain
 

Total Seats: 17


Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved.

Random quote: "A wise ruler ought never to keep faith when by doing so it would be against his interests." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70