We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Polygamous Relationships Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party (보수당)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4357
Description[?]:
Dear Colleagues, Men think they have the right to marry as many females as they like but this needs to stop We propose the stop recognising polygamous relationships. We believe in loyalty and by being married to so many people does not show loyalty. Instead it shows favouritism and loneliness to others We need to stop this and bring happiness back to both genders. If people want to be involved with others then that's not ok, cheating should be recognised to force change This will help gender equality and needs to be changed Elizabeth Kong Prime Minister and Gender Equality Campaigner |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to polygamy.
Old value:: Polygamous marriages are accorded equal recognition to monogamous marriages.
Current: The government does not recognise polygamous relationships.
Proposed: The government does not recognise polygamous relationships and prosecute those who pursue a polygamous lifestyle.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:35:40, March 02, 2018 CET | From | Sunrise Party 해돋이당 | To | Debating the Polygamous Relationships Act |
Message | "Honorable" Prime Minister, This is against our culture! and won't stand for it, we will not recognize the dictates of this petty White tyrant. The Empress' own mother was involved in a kind of polyamorous relationship with eh...Anyway, this is nothing more than western filth creeping into our homeland. Gender equality will never happen as women are stuck with childbirth-no amount of wishful thinking will change basic biology. If anything this condemns women as it destroys happy polygamous relationships. We will overturn this law first chance we get and criminalize monogamy instead! Henry Park ICP |
Date | 13:52:17, March 02, 2018 CET | From | Sunrise Party 해돋이당 | To | Debating the Polygamous Relationships Act |
Message | Additional comment by Rark: Frankly you are also a sexist as the law itself makes no distinction between who can have multiple spouses...Multiple husbands is a thing too. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 138 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 97 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 20 |
Random fact: Players must never be asked for their Particracy password. This includes Moderation; a genuine Moderator will never ask for your password. |
Random quote: "Victory attained by violence is tantamount to a defeat, for it is momentary." - Mahatma Gandhi |