We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom to Flirt Act of 4358
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4359
Description[?]:
| Loosens restrictions on sexually implicit actions. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.
Current: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:31:22, March 06, 2018 CET | From | All Progressive Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Flirt Act of 4358 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, As witnessed by this house, the PCP-APP government has continued to deliver progressive governance of the country despite a few sections' objection to APP and its ideology. Sir, we rise to support this bill not because we are power hungry as some may insinuate but because such bills bring about a more progressive modern way of life. Hon. Gionata Jiang MP APP Parliamentary Representative |
| Date | 05:51:12, March 06, 2018 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Flirt Act of 4358 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, PCP thanks APP and NWPG for their support of this bill that very clearly enhances freedoms in our country. Juan Pablo Cabal PCP Parliamentary Spokesperson |
| Date | 06:33:10, March 06, 2018 CET | From | Conservative Renew | To | Debating the Freedom to Flirt Act of 4358 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, What a sad day for common decency. With this bill everything except for intercourse itself is considered legal. Furthermore, the sexual harassment will now likely increase due this policy we consider this very anti progressive. Neil Puga SCP Parliamentary Leader |
| Date | 07:09:09, March 06, 2018 CET | From | All Progressive Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Flirt Act of 4358 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, APP would like to seek clarification from SCP, sexual harrasment even under current laws exists what this bill wishes to establish is freedom of expression in public. For how long do you want citizens to hide in dark alleys just to hold hands or kiss? Hon. Gionata Jiang MP APP Parliamentary Representative |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 259 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 41 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Presidency, n. The greased pig in the field game of American politics." - Ambrose Bierce |