We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military reform 4362
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alternative for Likatonia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4363
Description[?]:
| For a stronger and more competent Army |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation can only use chemical or biological weapons on non-civilan areas.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned but subsidised by the state.
Current: The state owns all defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Current: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Proposed: Open homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military has a "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in retaliation to any attack.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons on non-civilian areas.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Appointment of military officers
Old value:: The Ministry of Defense is authorized to appoint military officers.
Current: The head of state is responsible for the appointment of military officers.
Proposed: Military officers are only appointed through battlefield commission.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:43:54, March 13, 2018 CET | From | National Front | To | Debating the Military reform 4362 |
| Message | I only agree with three and five. Wherever nukes hit, they will kill at least one civilian. |
| Date | 22:25:48, March 13, 2018 CET | From | Council of Lords | To | Debating the Military reform 4362 |
| Message | We cannot support article 5, it might be of some use in measuring the competence of the officer corps, but a lot of soldiers are going to have to die for precious few officers. We must remember, bullets do not care for competence. Without Article 5 the lords of the council would support this bill. -Franz-Ulrich de Bérain |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 90 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 261 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 74 |
| Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
| Random quote: "The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." - Aristotle |