Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 03:19:26
Server time: 16:40:33, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): hyraemous | R Drax | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Moderation Act 4363

Details

Submitted by[?]: Beluzian National Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4363

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:52:29, March 15, 2018 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Moderation Act 4363
MessageThere are some articles that we disagree with and hope we can change after the passage of this bill

Date17:14:28, March 15, 2018 CET
FromBeluzian Coalition of the Regions
ToDebating the Moderation Act 4363
MessageDue to the president’s party to support this, we see no reason to stay in his cabinet.

Date18:15:29, March 15, 2018 CET
FromRadical Action
ToDebating the Moderation Act 4363
MessageWe will vote for this, because while we agree with the intention of the bill as a whole, but we are strongly against Articles 2 and 7.

Date03:39:39, March 16, 2018 CET
FromBeluzian National Party
ToDebating the Moderation Act 4363
MessageBPP respects KWRF's response in regards to this bill

Date05:58:00, March 16, 2018 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Moderation Act 4363
MessageWe oppose Article 2,7,10,12

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 373

no
 

Total Seats: 338

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "Racism is man's gravest threat to man - the maximum of hatred for a minimum of reason." - Abraham Joshua Heschel

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 121