Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 01:02:34
Server time: 02:57:25, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ADM Drax | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Defining our Country Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Likaton Fascist Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2197

Description[?]:

The Republic of Likatonia we feel has a rather sterile ring about it. We propose changing the name to something more descriptive.

We therefore propose changing the name of our country to to "The Free Republic of Likatonia".

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:47:07, March 06, 2006 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the Defining our Country Bill
MessageSo other Republics aren't free? Adding pointless words is meaningless, and they are usually added to cover up a regime that is the opposite of its title.

Date19:00:13, March 06, 2006 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Defining our Country Bill
MessageAM AAP supports this progressive move.

Date20:44:04, March 06, 2006 CET
FromProletariat Revolution Party
ToDebating the Defining our Country Bill
MessageAdding 1 word doesn't change the nation's image. Words can be descriptors or merely pretty tags we attach to the front of another word to make it prettier. By calling us the 'Free Republic of Likatonia', all you're doing is just adding a window dressing.

If you truly wanted to make a progressive title, you could do far better. Adding 'free' in front of republic, doesn't automatically make a nation a free republic.

Date22:13:17, March 06, 2006 CET
FromLikaton Fascist Front
ToDebating the Defining our Country Bill
MessageWell, we were considering "People's Democratic Republic of Likatonia".

Date11:46:37, March 07, 2006 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the Defining our Country Bill
MessageAre other republics not democratic then?

Date13:29:41, March 07, 2006 CET
FromLikaton Fascist Front
ToDebating the Defining our Country Bill
MessageWe fail to see the relevance of this question. Are you stating that we are so repressed we need to affix the word 'free' to our national title, or are you objecting to us reflecting the true nature of our republic in the long form title of our nation?

Date14:12:27, March 07, 2006 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Defining our Country Bill
MessageAre things in this country so perfest that this august body has nothing better to do with its valuable time than debate nomenclature? We, for one, think not! Get on with it so we may return to the true issues of the day.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 198

no
     

Total Seats: 247

abstain
 

Total Seats: 56


Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election.

Random quote: "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, okay? It's, like, incredible." - Donald Trump

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63