We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: More Firepower Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hosianism Daralian Strana
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4364
Description[?]:
| In this bill we allow conscientious objectors to serve non-combat roles allowing for someone willing to fight in combat to take their place. We also create a federal arms industry to increase weapons stockpiles. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards civilians who conscientiously object to being required to perform military service (if applicable).
Old value:: It is a criminal offence to refuse to perform military service.
Current: Conscientious objectors can be exempted from combatant roles, but not from non-combatant roles.
Proposed: Conscientious objectors can be exempted from combatant roles, but not from non-combatant roles.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: Defence industries are privately owned but subsidised by the state.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:54:18, March 16, 2018 CET | From | Deltarijanska Demokratska Unija - HD | To | Debating the More Firepower Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, This perfectly symbolizes our policy of Semi-privatization and individual freedom. We thank the HDS dor this proposal. |
| Date | 19:23:50, March 16, 2018 CET | From | Hosianism Daralian Strana | To | Debating the More Firepower Act |
| Message | It also gives more rights to conscientious objectors as now they can be useful in the military instead of just being on the front lines waiting to get shot. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 58 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 67 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Politics is for the present, but an equation is for eternity." - Albert Einstein |