We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Call for early elections, November 4363
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: July 4364
Description[?]:
| We, the Democratic Party, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. |
Proposals
Article 1
Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:43:39, March 16, 2018 CET | From |  Democratic Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, November 4363 |
| Message | Because C-GCP don’t proposed the PM to this election in the way of constitution so now we don’t have name of PM to work for our people. My party regret that why C-GCP don’t send the name of PM to be candidate but write another thing in Candidate box that not be the way of constitution. My party want the explain for your. |
| Date | 23:45:40, March 16, 2018 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, November 4363 |
| Message | In regret in the word of Transition Monarch that you don’t respect in referendum by peiple. |
| Date | 23:45:49, March 16, 2018 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, November 4363 |
| Message | In regret in the word of Transition Monarch that you don’t respect in referendum by peiple. |
| Date | 18:30:02, March 17, 2018 CET | From | *CMC* Cildanian-Gziri Central Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, November 4363 |
| Message | ?? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 163 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 137 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "The only people who would be hurt by abandoning the Kyoto Protocol would be several thousand people who make a living attending conferences on global warming." - Kirill Kondratyev |